Line 18 a3w2 Neutrino Split Decay Muon Quarks Mesons 5g UFO Formulas WOW SETI

Line 18 a3w2 Neutrino Split Decay Muon Quarks Mesons 5g UFO Formulas WOW SETI

5g force ufo engine acceleration plasma formulas

part 135 of 100 videos there are more videos after this one i’ll post all then update the #.
Math Equation Wow Seti 1977 radio signal alien

14/

3/4/4/1/1/1/1/11=0.017
14/0.017=823.5294

My thoughts continued: feb 17 2012 12 24 pm est

So we need a charged current interaction.

So can the turbine invention send a laser beam to the neutrinos

To charge them into the equivalent charged leptons.

inverse beta decay, νe + p → n + e+

neutrino-electron scattering, ν + e → ν + e) or because it breaks up

(e.g.2H + ν → p + n + ν).

Since atoms split and join other particles.

Using a moderator with the neutrino electron scattering can you slow it down so it doesn’t break up but instead splits in half and doubles the power?

Let’s see if anyone’s split a neutrino?

The neutrino spectral split in core-collapse supernovae: a magnetic resonance phenomenon
Sebastien Galais, Cristina Volpe
(Submitted on 28 Mar 2011 (v1), last revised 26 Aug 2011 (this version, v2))

Feb 17 2012 523 pm est
My thoughts

The key word here is Y and BEAM

Upsilon-mesons

Four quarks..

I said the neutrino’s divided up into four quarks and you couldn’t see them during your testing.

I would look to see if these y 5s particles are the same as neutrinos

And maybe they’ve given them a different name in japan than in north america…

My thoughts

Feb 17 2012 5 18 pm est

Based on the results of this experiment what if the neutrinos split and divided into two smaller particles or even four so that they could not be detected because our particle reactors cannot detect something that small?

quote
So when an up quark emits a W+ boson it can turn into other quarks than just the down quark. Electric charge has to be conserved, so the other possible quarks, besides the down, with charge -1/3, are the strange and bottom.

Now over the long term, since the strange and bottom quarks weigh more than the up quark, the interaction will end up with just the down quark (the strange and bottom quarks will convert to a down quark, or be reabsorbed, or do something cool).

But on a short enough time scale, any of the down quarks (d,s,b) can end up created along with that W+. Like anything in quantum mechanics, there are different probabilities of these things happening.

And, like anything in quantum mechanics, there are different phases, which can cause interference. Our sum total knowledge of what happens in this interaction is held in the Cabibo-Kobayashi-Masakawa (or CKM) matrix.

The entries of the matrix specify an up type quark (u,c,t) and a down type quark (d,s,b).

It has 3×3 = 9 entries, running from “ud” to “tb”; each entry “xy” defines the amplitude that when a the W+ emitted by an “x” quark with charge +2/3, the resulting quark with charge -1/3 will be the “y” quark.
Feb 17 2012 550 pm est

My thoughts

You can take the formula’s i’ve provided and see if you can split the neutrinos into four quarks which seems to be the case in your experiments. Thus we’d technically have 4 times the power of one neutrino if this is the case.

What kind of velocity do youthink that could create? Four times the speed of light.

4 * the speed of light = 1 199 169 832 m / s

Now take this equation and figure out with your mathematical functions how fast you would arrive at MARS with this type of UFO ENGINE speed?

I have no idea how to do that.. Do you?

Let us know!

quote

This means that when Earth and Mars are closest to each other, the distance would be about 1.5 – 1.0 =0.5 times the average distance of Earth from the Sun. When Earth and Mars are on opposite sides of the Sun, the distance between would be about 1.5 + 1.0 = 2.5 times the average distance of the Earth from the Sun. Astronomers, and later space exploration scientists, have been working at measuring the average Earth-Sun distance, called the Astronomical Unit, for several hundred years and arrived at a value of about 149,598,000 kilometers (since a spacecraft crashed into Mars because someone didn’t use units of measure like meters, kilograms, etc…

0.5* 149,598,000=74,799,000

1 199 169 832*60=49,920 m/hr

74,799,000/49,920=1,498.3774 hours

1,498.3774/24=62.4324 days

7*4.5=31.5 days/weeks

62.4324/31.5=1.982 months

Less than 2 months to get there

I said 3 days.. I guess i was off quite a bit.

62.4324/3=20.8108

20.8108

So you would have to split the neutrinos 5 times in order to make it 20 times altogether.

Molecule
Resonance circuits

Leptons
Turbine charger
Laser beam
Inverse beta decay
Atoms
Particles

neutrino spectral split in core-collapse supernovae: a magnetic resonance phenomenon
Sebastien Galais, Cristina Volpe

Cabibo-Kobayashi-Masakawa (or CKM) matrix

notes

quote

Google neutrinos transfers energy to muon

We can only detect the presence of a neutrino in our experiment if it interacts. Neutrinos interact in two ways:

• charged-current interactions, where the neutrino converts into the equivalent charged lepton (e.g. inverse beta decay, νe + p → n + e+) – the experiment detects the charged lepton;

• neutral-current interactions, where the neutrino remains a neutrino, but transfers energy and momentum to whatever it interacted with – we detect this energy transfer, either because the target recoils (e.g. neutrino-electron scattering, ν + e → ν + e) or because it breaks up (e.g.2H + ν → p + n + ν).

Pasted from
My thoughts continued: feb 17 2012 12 24 pm est

So we need a charged current interaction.

So can the turbine invention send a laser beam to the neutrinos

To charge them into the equivalent charged leptons.

inverse beta decay, νe + p → n + e+

neutrino-electron scattering, ν + e → ν + e) or because it breaks up

(e.g.2H + ν → p + n + ν).

Since atoms split and join other particles.

Using a moderator with the neutrino electron scattering can you slow it down so it doesn’t break up but instead splits in half and doubles the power?

Let’s see if anyone’s split a neutrino?

Google split neutrino

Muon decay a stationary muon suddenly decays into an electron and neutrinos.

The neutrino spectral split in core-collapse supernovae: a magnetic resonance phenomenon
Sebastien Galais, Cristina Volpe
(Submitted on 28 Mar 2011 (v1), last revised 26 Aug 2011 (this version, v2))
A variety of neutrino flavour conversion phenomena occur in core-collapse supernova, due to the large neutrino density close to the neutrinosphere, and the importance of the neutrino-neutrino interaction.

Three different regimes have been identified so far, usually called the synchronization, the bipolar oscillations and the spectral split.

Using the formalism of polarization vectors, within two-flavours, we focus on the spectral split phenomenon and we show for the first time that the physical mechanism underlying the neutrino spectral split is a magnetic resonance phenomenon.

In particular, we show that the precession frequencies fulfill the magnetic resonance conditions.

Our numerical calculations show that the neutrino energies and the location at which the resonance takes place in the supernova coincide well with the neutrino energies at which a spectral swap occurs.

The corresponding adiabaticity parameters present spikes at the resonance location.
Comments: 11 pages, 9 figures, text and references added
Subjects: Solar and Stellar Astrophysics (astro-ph.SR); High Energy Physics – Phenomenology (hep-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:1103.5302v2 [astro-ph.SR]
Submission history
From: Cristina Volpe [view email] 
[v1] Mon, 28 Mar 2011 09:16:36 GMT (1493kb,D)
[v2] Fri, 26 Aug 2011 08:46:46 GMT (1495kb,D)

Pasted from

Induced beta decay. An electron-neutrino can cause a neutron to turn into a proton and an electron.

“Induced beta decay”. An electron-neutrino can cause a neutron to turn into a proton and an electron. A muon neutrino would create a proton and a muon. The anti-neutrinos can induce a reverse-beta-decay, where a proton is turned into a neutron and anti-electron (or anti-muon or anti-tauon).

Pasted from

Muon decay: a stationary muon suddenly decays into an electron and neutrinos. Left: if hypothetically, during muon decay, only one neutrino were created then since the total energy released is always the same and momentum always needs to be balanced, the electron (the only thing we see) would always be ejected at the same speed.

Right: in practice we see the newly created electron ejected at a wide variety of speeds. It takes a bit of analysis, but what we see is consistent with the creation of two unseen particles.

Pasted from

quotes

Google magnetic resonance phenomenon.

Acupunct Electrother Res. 1986;11(2):127-45.
Electro-magnetic resonance phenomenon as a possible mechanism related to the “bi-digital o-ring test molecular identification and localization method”.
Omura Y.

Abstract
The author hypothesizes that the mechanism of the “Bi-Digital O-Ring Test Molecular Identification and Localization Method” is due to an electro-magnetic wave resonance phenomenon between two identical substances having an identical resonance frequency and separated by a known distance.

Such a hypothesis was tested and proved by using two identical sets of electro-magnetic resonance circuits, each consisting of a fixed inductance (L) and variable capacitance (C), in place of two identical substances or molecules.

When one of the resonance circuits was connected or placed close to the body surface and when the frequency of the other resonance circuit was made identical to the one placed next to the body, a maximal weakening response of the “Bi-Digital O-Ring Test” was observed only when the axes of the coils of the two separate sets of resonance circuits were oriented perpendicular to each other; when the axes of the coils of the two separate sets of resonance circuits were oriented parallel to each other, no “Bi-Digital O-Ring Test” weakening response was observed, even when both resonance circuits had an identical resonance frequency.

The information about the molecular structure and quantity of any molecule is contained in the specific electro-magnetic field emitted by the particular molecule.

These electro-magnetic waves, containing information about the particular substance, can be propagated through a metal wire, through a “concentrated electro-magnetic field projector,” or through a light beam with wavelength longer than green color (particularly a monochromatic, collimated light beam or soft laser beam).

In the cases in which a light beam is used, the monochromatic light beam (including laser beam) acts as a very high frequency carrier of the electro-magnetic waves emitted from a particular substance placed near the source of the light beam or near the end of the light beam, and information on the molecular structure and amount of the substance is carried by the light beam (including laser beam) in both forward and backward directions (bi-directional propagation of information).

Even reflected light from any molecule or substance in the visual field that reaches the eyes carries information on the substance to the eye ground, particularly when the individual is gazing at the substance; simultaneously, information on a substance not normally existing in the body that happens to be in the body is sent out from the eye ground in electro-magnetic waves to the object being gazed at by the individual.

PMID:
 
2879416
 
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Pasted from

key words
Acupunct Electrother Res. 1986;11(2):127-45.
Electro-magnetic resonance phenomenon as a possible mechanism related to the “bi-digital o-ring test molecular identification and localization method”.
Omura Y.

Distribution of mass for the combination of a π and a χc1 meson. The peaks at 4050 MeV and 4250 MeV correspond to the Z1 and Z2 particles.

Pasted from
Measured production rate of an upsilon and two pions as a function of the collision energy of the e+and e– beams. The production rate peaks at 10,890 MeV for all the three types of upsilon-mesons ((1S)-blue, (2S)-red,(3S)-green); the dashed line indicates the mass of the Υ(5S).

Pasted from

Measured production rate of an upsilon and two pions as a function of the collision energy of the e+and e– beams.

Feb 17 2012 523 pm est
My thoughts

The key word here is Y and BEAM

Upsilon-mesons

Four quarks..

I said the neutrino’s divided up into four quarks and you couldn’t see them during your testing.

I would look to see if these y 5s particles are the same as neutrinos

And maybe they’ve given them a different name in japan than in north america…

The explanation for the deficit in neutrinos is now called “neutrino oscillation.” In the theory of neutrino oscillation, these solar neutrinos are “electron neutrinos”, and in their passage to the earth, they change form and become “muon neutrinos” or “tau neutrinos.” 

it will be better if we follow convention and split the neutrino emission and absorption up by putting a W boson between the quarks and leptons

Pasted from

Now the problem with all this was that the number of neutrinos being detected on the right did not seem to equal the number of neutrinos that were pretty much known to be emitted on the left. Something was happening to them.

Pasted from

According to the latest Wikipedia data, the 

 entry for the CKM matrix is 0.97383. It’s an amplitude, so to get a probability we have to square it; the resulting probability for the down quark is about 94.83%. So this isn’t much of a cause for a neutrino deficit; and as I mentioned above, this doesn’t matter anyway, a higher generation quark would just decay down to the d anyway.

Pasted from

The explanation for the deficit in neutrinos is now called “neutrino oscillation.”

Pasted from

The W bosons are named after the Weak force

Pasted from

 entry for the CKM matrix is 0.97383

0.97383 * the speed of light = 291 946 889 m / s

Pasted from

My thoughts

Feb 17 2012 5 18 pm est

Based on the results of this experiment what if the neutrinos split and divided into two smaller particles or even four so that they could not be detected because our particle reactors cannot detect something that small?

quote
So when an up quark emits a W+ boson it can turn into other quarks than just the down quark. Electric charge has to be conserved, so the other possible quarks, besides the down, with charge -1/3, are the strange and bottom.

Now over the long term, since the strange and bottom quarks weigh more than the up quark, the interaction will end up with just the down quark (the strange and bottom quarks will convert to a down quark, or be reabsorbed, or do something cool).

But on a short enough time scale, any of the down quarks (d,s,b) can end up created along with that W+. Like anything in quantum mechanics, there are different probabilities of these things happening.

And, like anything in quantum mechanics, there are different phases, which can cause interference. Our sum total knowledge of what happens in this interaction is held in the Cabibo-Kobayashi-Masakawa (or CKM) matrix.

Pasted from http://carlbrannen.wordpress.com/2008/06/21/neutrino-oscillation-or-interference/

The entries of the matrix specify an up type quark (u,c,t) and a down type quark (d,s,b).

It has 3×3 = 9 entries, running from “ud” to “tb”; each entry “xy” defines the amplitude that when a the W+ emitted by an “x” quark with charge +2/3, the resulting quark with charge -1/3 will be the “y” quark.

Pasted from http://carlbrannen.wordpress.com/2008/06/21/neutrino-oscillation-or-interference/

CERN COURIER
Oct 20, 2008
Belle finds more exotic mesons
The Belle collaboration has announced the discovery at the Japanese B-factory, KEKB, of three new exotic sub-atomic particles, which they have labelled the Z1, Z2 and Yb. The Z1and Z2 states appear to be particles consisting of four quarks, while the Yb may be the first clear example of an exotic hybrid particle, containing an excited gluon in addition to a quark–antiquark pair.

Fig. 1.
In the past few years, a number of peculiar new particles, including the X(3872), Y(4260), X(3940) and Y(3940), have been found both at Belle and at the BaBar experiment at SLAC. Last year, the Belle team reported the first exotic particle containing a c and c quark with non-zero electric charge, the Z(4430)

(CERN Courier May 2005 p7 and CERN CourierJanuary/February 2008 p7).

The Belle collaboration has now found further new particle states in the decay products of B mesons produced at KEKB.

The team searched for states decaying into a π and χc1, a well known charmonium meson, and found mass peaks at 4051 MeV and 4248 MeV (figure 1), which they have named the Z1 and Z2 respectively (Mizuk et al. 2008). Like the Z(4430), the states have non-zero electric charge and could be further examples of particles consisting of four quarks – a c and cbound together with a quark and different antiquark, as in cucd, for example.

The Yb state was found in a different way: in an energy scan of the KEKB accelerator where the Belle team observed a dramatic increase in the production rate of the upsilon together with two pions at an energy of 10,890 MeV (figure 2).

This indicates the production of a new particle decaying into an upsilon and two pions. This could be the first example of an exotic bottomonium particle, consisting of a bound state of a b and b together with an excited gluon, although there are other possible interpretations.

Further reading
R Mizuk et al. The Belle Collaboration 2008 subm. Phys. Rev. D 

http://arxiv.org/abs/0806.4098.

Pasted from

mass number of events two new particles red line without new particles data blue line wow seti

quotes

Since the neutrinos were produced from an extremely high energy reaction they carry quite a punch.  The particles resulting from the interaction move fast enough through the water in the detector that they form “Cherenkov radiation”, which is essentially a “sonic boom made of light” (or, the result of it at least).  By looking at how the “boom” hits the light sensors around the detector you can get energy and direction information about the original particle.

Pasted from
Cherenkov radiation (also spelled Cerenkov or Čerenkov) is electromagnetic radiation emitted when a charged particle (such as an electron) passes through a dielectric medium at a speed greater than the phase velocity of light in that medium. The charged particles polarize the molecules of that medium, which then turn back rapidly to their ground state, emitting radiation in the process. 

Pasted from

Astrophysics experiments
When a high-energy (TeV) gamma photon or cosmic ray interacts with the Earth’s atmosphere, it may produce an electron-positron pair with enormous velocities. 

Pasted from

Particle physics experiments
See also: Cherenkov detector and Ring imaging Cherenkov detector
Cherenkov radiation is commonly used in experimental particle physics for particle identification. One could measure (or put limits on) the velocity of an electrically charged elementary particle by the properties of the Cherenkov light it emits in a certain medium. If the momentum of the particle is measured independently, one could compute the mass of the particle by its momentum and velocity (see four-momentum), and hence identify the particle.

Pasted from

The simplest type of particle identification device based on a Cherenkov radiation technique is the threshold counter, which gives an answer as to whether the velocity of a charged particle is lower or higher than a certain value (v0 = c / n, where c is the speed of light, and n is the refractive index of the medium) by looking at whether this particle does or does not emit Cherenkov light in a certain medium. Knowing particle momentum, one can separate particles lighter than a certain threshold from those heavier than the threshold.

Pasted from

 In a RICH detector, a cone of Cherenkov light is produced when a high speed charged particle traverses a suitable gaseous or liquid medium, often called radiator. This light cone is detected on a position sensitive planar photon detector, which allows reconstructing a ring or disc, the radius of which is a measure for the Cherenkov emission angle. Both focusing and proximity-focusing detectors are in use. In a focusing RICH detector, the photons are collected by a spherical mirror and focused onto the photon detector placed at the focal plane. The result is a circle with a radius independent of the emission point along the particle track. This scheme is suitable for low refractive index radiators—i.e. gases—due to the larger radiator length needed to create enough photons. In the more compact proximity-focusing design, a thin radiator volume emits a cone of Cherenkov light which traverses a small distance—the proximity gap—and is detected on the photon detector plane. The image is a ring of light, the radius of which is defined by the Cherenkov emission angle and the proximity gap. The ring thickness is determined by the thickness of the radiator. An example of a proximity gap RICH detector is the High Momentum Particle Identification Detector (HMPID),[5] a detector currently under construction for ALICE (A Large Ion Collider Experiment), one of the six experiments at the LHC (Large Hadron Collider) at CERN.

Pasted from

Feb 17 2012 550 pm est

My thoughts

You can take the formula’s i’ve provided and see if you can split the neutrinos into four quarks which seems to be the case in your experiments. Thus we’d technically have 4 times the power of one neutrino if this is the case.

What kind of velocity do youthink that could create? Four times the speed of light.

4 * the speed of light = 1 199 169 832 m / s

Pasted from http://www.google.ca/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ie=UTF-8&ion=1#hl=en&output=search&sclient=psy-ab&q=4*%20the%20speed%20of%20light&pbx=1&oq=&aq=&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=&gs_upl=&fp=bb87acda14707407&ion=1&ion=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=bb87acda14707407&biw=1600&bih=775&ion=1

Now take this equation and figure out with your mathematical functions how fast you would arrive at MARS with this type of UFO ENGINE speed?

I have no idea how to do that.. Do you?

Let us know!

This means that when Earth and Mars are closest to each other, the distance would be about 1.5 – 1.0 =0.5 times the average distance of Earth from the Sun. When Earth and Mars are on opposite sides of the Sun, the distance between would be about 1.5 + 1.0 = 2.5 times the average distance of the Earth from the Sun. Astronomers, and later space exploration scientists, have been working at measuring the average Earth-Sun distance, called the Astronomical Unit, for several hundred years and arrived at a value of about 149,598,000 kilometers (since a spacecraft crashed into Mars because someone didn’t use units of measure like meters, kilograms, etc…

Pasted from http://athena.cornell.edu/kids/tommy_tt_issue3.html

0.5* 149,598,000=74,799,000

1 199 169 832*60=49,920 m/hr

74,799,000/49,920=1,498.3774 hours

1,498.3774/24=62.4324 days

7*4.5=31.5 days/weeks

62.4324/31.5=1.982 months

Less than 2 months to get there

I said 3 days.. I guess i was off quite a bit.

62.4324/3=20.8108

20.8108

So you would have to split the neutrinos 5 times in order to make it 20 times altogether.