Line 18 a3w4 Uranium Neutrino Split Z Bosons Weak Atomic 5g UFO WOW SETI

Line 18 a3w4 Uranium Neutrino Split Z Bosons Weak Atomic 5g UFO WOW SETI

5g force ufo engine acceleration plasma formulas

part 137 of 100 videos there are more videos after this one i’ll post all then update the #.
Math Equation Wow Seti 1977 radio signal alien

14/

3/4/4/1/1/1/1/11=0.017
14/0.017=823.5294

Feb 17 2012 118 pm est

My thoughts:

If uranium absorbs a slow-moving free neutron

Then

Uranium 238 + (neutron) neutrino (slowed down by cooling the plasma with invention found) + unstability + splits into two smaller atoms “fission products”

So we have an idea on how to transfer energy from a neutrino to a lepton and now this says you can use “uranium” to split a neutron.. Can it split a neutrino into smaller particles thus doubling the amount of energy produced.

Then we need to speed it up, cause more collisions with a laser beam so we can generate more energy within the “argon gas”

I did a Google on neutron neutrino to see how they are related and it says that neutrinos are not affected by an electric charge. So in order to get it to split we’d have to use a “weak sub atomic force.”

So I looked further …

The Z and W bosons are much heavier than protons or neutrons and it is the heaviness that accounts for the very short range of the weak interaction.

Z bosons came up a few videos ago… So we have a new formula to try

Z Bosons + Neutrinos + short range pulse of laser beam = new type of energy?

Search z bosons in WOW SETI notes it’s on 14 modules:

Go to the light (not titled or filmed yet)

Lines 15a, 16a, 24, 15b, 15e, 15f, 15b2, 16b, 15 nn, 18x, 18a3m, 18a3t, (latest one) 18a3w

Line 18 a3t Gluon Spin quark Z bosons eRHIC coefficients Hadron Rings WOW SETI

Is the latest in this data.

Lepton energy + transferred from + neutrinos + collision particles + quarks +gluons +proton + antiproton + beam + laser + Z bosons + decay + muon = accelerated plasma?

The Very Large Hadron Collider (VLHC) is a name for a hypothetical future hadron collider with performance significantly beyond the Large Hadron Collider.[1]

Reading the quotes from the data above and this stands out:

Quote:
a pressurized water reactor (PWR) a considerable portion of the fissions are produced by higher-energy neutrons.

“high energy neutrons”

Is the ultimate goal.

Maybe they already know how to convert them into energy but it’s not openly discussed.

They want to figure out how to split them and I’ve created several formulas that might work …

Quote:

In the proposed water-cooled supercritical water reactor (SCWR), the proportion of fast fissions may exceed 50%, making it technically a fast neutron reactor.

A fast reactor uses no moderator, but relies on fission produced by unmoderated fast neutrons to sustain the chain reaction.

My thoughts continued:

Fast fissions may exceed 50% – a fast neutron reactor

No moderator

Fission + fast neutrons + ? For a chain reaction

My idea:

Fission + fast neutrons + leptons splitting to transfer energy + quarks + pions + the use of Kinetic energy

Lets google and see what comes up.

Quote:

The first artificially induced nuclear fission reaction was achieved by Enrico Fermi in 1934, although at the time he did not realise that fission had occurred.

Fermi bombarded uranium with neutrons and produced radioactive products that emitted b-particles.

Fermi assumed that he had produced a new isotope of uranium, U-239, and that this had undergone beta decay to form an isotope of the first transuranic element, atomic number 93, known today as neptunium-239.

Further transuranic elements could then be formed by further beta decays.

Two German chemists, Otto Hahn and Fritz Strassman, repeated Fermi’s experiments in 1938 and used careful isotopic half-life analysis to identify the products of the reaction.

To their surprise they found that not only was U-239 produced but also various lighter elements, such as Ba-141, Kr-92, Ba-144, Kr-89, La-148, Br-85, Xe-143 & Sr-90. Hahn and Strassman suspected that these lighter elements were the products of the splitting of the uranium nucleus.

This suspicion was confirmed in 1939 by two Austrian physicists, Lise Meitner and Otto Frisch, who showed that when a U-235 nucleus absorbs a neutron, the nucleus splits into two smaller nuclei and emits one, two or three neutrons in the process.

Meitner & Frisch called the process nuclear fission.

Feb 17 2012 128 pm est

My thoughts continued:

According to this U 235 nucleus absorbs a neutron, the nucleus splits into two smaller nuclei (what are their names?) and emits ONE, TWO, or THREE Neutrons in the process..

Ergo Nuclear FISSION is part of the equation.

notes

Reactor moderators
In a thermal nuclear reactor, the nucleus of a heavy fuel element such as uranium absorbs a slow-moving free neutron, becomes unstable, and then splits (“fissions”) into two smaller atoms (“fission products”).

The newly released fast neutrons, moving at roughly 10% of the speed of light, must be slowed down or “moderated,” typically to speeds of a few kilometres per second, if they are to be likely to cause further fission in neighbouring 235U nuclei and hence continue the chain reaction.

This speed happens to be equivalent to temperatures in the few hundred Celsius range. In all moderated reactors, some neutrons of all energy levels will produce fission, including fast neutrons.

Some reactors are more fully thermalised than others; for example, in a CANDU reactor nearly all fission reactions are produced by thermal neutrons, while in a pressurized water reactor (PWR) a considerable portion of the fissions are produced by higher-energy neutrons.

In the proposed water-cooled supercritical water reactor (SCWR), the proportion of fast fissions may exceed 50%, making it technically a fast neutron reactor.

A fast reactor uses no moderator, but relies on fission produced by unmoderated fast neutrons to sustain the chain reaction.

In some fast reactor designs, up to 20% of fissions can come from direct fast neutron fission of uranium-238, an isotope which is not fissile at all with thermal neutrons.

Moderators are also used in non-reactor neutron sources, such as plutonium-beryllium and spallation sources.

Pasted from

Feb 17 2012 118 pm est

My thoughts:

If uranium absorbs a slow-moving free neutron

Then

Uranium 238 + (neutron) neutrino (slowed down by cooling the plasma with invention found) + unstability + splits into two smaller atoms “fission products”

So we have an idea on how to transfer energy from a neutrino to a lepton and now this says you can use “uranium” to split a neutron.. Can it split a neutrino into smaller particles thus doubling the amount of energy produced.

Then we need to speed it up, cause more collisions with a laser beam so we can generate more energy within the “argon gas”

I did a Google on neutron neutrino to see how they are related and it says that neutrinos are not affected by an electric charge. So in order to get it to split we’d have to use a “weak sub atomic force.”

So I looked further …

Quote

Neutrinos do not carry electric charge, which means that they are not affected by the electromagnetic forces that act on charged particles such as electrons and protons. Neutrinos are affected only by the weak sub-atomic force, of much shorter range than electromagnetism, and gravity, which is relatively weak on the subatomic scale. They are therefore able to travel great distances through matter without being affected by it.

Pasted from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino

Quote:

In the Standard Model of particle physics the weak interaction is theorised as being caused by the exchange (i.e., emission or absorption) of W and Z bosons; and because it is a consequence of the emission (or absorption) of bosons it is a non-contact force.

The best known effect of this emission is beta decay, a form of radioactivity.

The Z and W bosons are much heavier than protons or neutrons and it is the heaviness that accounts for the very short range of the weak interaction.

Pasted from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_interaction

Z bosons came up a few videos ago… So we have a new formula to try

Z Bosons + Neutrinos + short range pulse of laser beam = new type of energy?

Search z bosons in WOW SETI notes it’s on 14 modules:

Go to the light (not titled or filmed yet)

Lines 15a, 16a, 24, 15b, 15e, 15f, 15b2, 16b, 15 nn, 18x, 18a3m, 18a3t, (latest one) 18a3w

Line 18 a3t Gluon Spin quark Z bosons eRHIC coefficients Hadron Rings WOW SETI

Is the latest in this data.

Quote

Tevatron through collisions of the particles (quarks and gluons) inside the proton and antiproton beams. Once Z bosons are produced they decay into lepton–anti-lepton pairs (e.g. electron-positron or muon–anti-muon).

Lepton energy + transferred from + neutrinos + collision particles + quarks +gluons +proton + antiproton + beam + laser + Z bosons + decay + muon = accelerated plasma?

Google Tevatron

Quote:
The Tevatron is a circular particle accelerator in the United States, at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (also known as Fermilab), just east of Batavia, Illinois, and is the second highest energy particle collider in the world after the Large Hadron Collider (LHC).

Pasted from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tevatron

The Tevatron (background) and Main Injectorrings

The Very Large Hadron Collider (VLHC) is a name for a hypothetical future hadron collider with performance significantly beyond the Large Hadron Collider.[1]

Pasted from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very_Large_Hadron_Collider

Reading the quotes from the data above and this stands out:

Quote:
a pressurized water reactor (PWR) a considerable portion of the fissions are produced by higher-energy neutrons.

“high energy neutrons”

Is the ultimate goal.

Maybe they already know how to convert them into energy but it’s not openly discussed.

They want to figure out how to split them and I’ve created several formulas that might work …

Quote:

In the proposed water-cooled supercritical water reactor (SCWR), the proportion of fast fissions may exceed 50%, making it technically a fast neutron reactor.

A fast reactor uses no moderator, but relies on fission produced by unmoderated fast neutrons to sustain the chain reaction.

My thoughts continued:

Fast fissions may exceed 50% – a fast neutron reactor

No moderator

Fission + fast neutrons + ? For a chain reaction

My idea:

Fission + fast neutrons + leptons splitting to transfer energy + quarks + pions + the use of Kinetic energy

Lets google and see what comes up.

Quote:

 The first artificially induced nuclear fission reaction was achieved by Enrico Fermi in 1934, although at the time he did not realise that fission had occurred. 

Fermi bombarded uranium with neutrons and produced radioactive products that emitted b-particles. 

Fermi assumed that he had produced a new isotope of uranium, U-239, and that this had undergone beta decay to form an isotope of the first transuranic element, atomic number 93, known today as neptunium-239. 

Further transuranic elements could then be formed by further beta decays.

Two German chemists, Otto Hahn and Fritz Strassman, repeated Fermi’s experiments in 1938 and used careful isotopic half-life analysis to identify the products of the reaction. 

To their surprise they found that not only was U-239 produced but also various lighter elements, such as Ba-141, Kr-92, Ba-144, Kr-89, La-148, Br-85, Xe-143 & Sr-90.  Hahn and Strassman suspected that these lighter elements were the products of the splitting of the uranium nucleus. 

This suspicion was confirmed in 1939 by two Austrian physicists, Lise Meitner and Otto Frisch, who showed that when a U-235 nucleus absorbs a neutron, the nucleus splits into two smaller nuclei and emits one, two or three neutrons in the process. 

Meitner & Frisch called the process nuclear fission. 

Pasted from http://webs.mn.catholic.edu.au/physics/emery/hsc_quanta_continued.htm

Feb 17 2012 128 pm est

My thoughts continued:

According to this U 235 nucleus absorbs a neutron, the nucleus splits into two smaller nuclei (what are their names?) and emits ONE, TWO, or THREE Neutrons in the process..

Ergo Nuclear FISSION is part of the equation.

Quote:
ENERGY FROM FISSION
The binding energy curve shows that a heavy nucleus has a binding energy of about 7 MeV per nucleon, whereas nuclei of elements with roughly half the mass number have average binding energies of about 8 MeV per nucleon. 

Thus, when the heavy nucleus splits to form two lighter nuclei, there is a release of about 1 MeV of energy per nucleon.  So, for a heavy nucleus of 200 nucleons, there would be a release of about 200 MeV of energy from each fission. 

Clearly, tremendous amounts of energy can be produced from sustained fission reactions.  For example, the fission of 1 kg of uranium releases about 9 x 1010 kJ of energy. 

Taking a typical energy value for coal of about 30 kJ/g means that the fission of 1 kg of uranium produces as much energy as the burning of about 3 million kg of coal.
An example of a typical fission reaction is:
 
            

We can calculate the energy released in this reaction in a couple of different ways.  

We can either determine the difference between the binding energies of the products and reactants or we can find the difference between the masses of the products and reactants and then convert this mass difference into its energy equivalent using Einstein’s E = mc2 equation.

Note that as a general rule, energy is released from a nuclear reaction when the binding energy of the products is greater than that of the reactants. 

Energy is released because some mass is converted to energy. 

Cleary then, we can also say that energy is released from a nuclear reaction when the mass of the products is less than that of the reactants.
Return to Top of Page
 

Pasted from http://webs.mn.catholic.edu.au/physics/emery/hsc_quanta_continued.htm

The Tevatron (background) and Main Injectorrings the very large hadro collider vlhc wow seti future plans